Last modified: 2018-07-23
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pembelajaran yang terpusat pada guru dan penyampaian pada kegiatan pembelajaran yang masih menggunanakan pembelajaran konvensional, sedangkan pada kurikulum 2013 pembelajaran harus berpusat kepada siswa. Hal tersebut membuat peserta didik cenderung lebih pasif dan belum berperan aktif pada kegiatan belajar mengajar ketika berlangsung sehingga aktivitas belajar peserta didik rendah. Berdasarkan data hasil penelitian diperoleh rata-rata hasil belajar kognitif kelompok eksperimen sebesar x = 89,54
dan kelompok kontrol
x = 75,90 dengan n1
= 11 dan
n2
= 11 diperoleh
t
hit ung =
2,646017 dengan α = 5% dengan dk = 11+11−2 = 20 diperoleh
t
t abel
= 2,086
t hitung > t tabel maka
H0 ditolak sehingga ada perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar tema
berbagai pekerjaan antara kelompok yang menggunakan model talking stick dengan yang menggunakan model konvensional. Berdasarkan data hasil penelitiandiperoleh rata-rata nilai keaktifan kelompok eksperimen sebesar
= 84,84 dan
x
kelompok kontrol
x = 75,76 dengan n
= 11 dan n
2
= 11 diperoleh t
hit ung
= 3,143944
1
karena t hitung > t tabel dengan α = 5% dengan dk = 11+11−2 = 20 diperoleh t t abel = 2,086 maka H0 ditolak sehingga ada perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar tema berbagai pekerjaan anatara kelompok yang menggunakan model talking stick dengan yamg menggunakan model konvensional.
Kata Kunci: Model Kooperatif Tipe Talking Stick, Hasil Belajar, Keaktifan
Siswa.
This research is motivated by teacher-centered learning and delivery of learning activities that still use conventional learning, while in the curriculum of 2013 learning should be centered on the students. This makes students tend to be more passive and have not played an active role in teaching and learning activities while underway so that learning activities of learners low. Based on the research data, the average of cognitive learning achievement of experimental group is 89.54 and
control group IS 75,90 with
n1
= 11 and
n2
= 11 obtained
t
hit ung = 2,646017 with α
= 5% with dk = 11+11−2 = 20 obtained
t
t abel
= 2,086
t hitung > t tabel
then
H0
is
rejected so that there is a difference in average learning outcomes theme various jobs between groups using the talking stick model using conventional models. Based on the data of the research results obtained the average value of the activity
of the experimental group amounted to
x = 84,84 and control group
x = 75,76 with
n = 11 and n
2
= 11 obtained t
hit ung
= 3,143944 because t
hitung
> t
tabel
with α = 5%
1
with dk = 11+11−2 = 20 obtained t t abel
= 2,086 then H0 rejected so that there are
differences in average learning outcomes theme various work between groups who use talking stick model with yamg using conventional model.